President Obama v. Conservatives

It has always been part of the Republican electric to defeat and beat democrats, yet what we have seen in this party or base called: Republicans are outside of the general public. The National Republican base has become some sort of a joke in politics. Paul Ryan, has been part of the leadership that was waged differences in baiting a divide in someone who has pigment in their skin. This is a social vetting process that many fiscal conservatives' likes to point out on distinguishing themselves from Caucasian members of this American conservative movement in the 2000 era.

Let me be frankly clear on this subject, I am a Barack Obama supporter based on his economic policy. He has the right steady approach that can manage government, private, plus public interest-where it can improve an economy. Obama's road to recovery, has stabled the foundation in this country's economic structure. And has a moderate view on the taxing code of this country's financial outlook. This same administration has placed in key policies that have allowed the private sector to grow in record numbers - with 23 consecutive months of private sector growth. Which mean, public moneys were placed in private companies to spur consumer confidence? Consumer confidence is based on risk factors, marketing strategies, and projection outlook based on the values represented in the market.

Like, making the move to invest in General Motors (some people say bailout) moderates will call it an investment. When that investment made public became the outcry of: Government will take over the auto industry. Which was the exact opposite: Government gave the corporation an extended life line-investing in a turn-a-round process. What happened - GM is now the number company in the automotive industry in the world. That's one investment he made, and President Barack Obama didn't place on single mandate on GM, and only asking them to keep jobs in America. Now we are looking at profit gains for an American Company instead of share losses, and public debt on the death of a company. Since the American Public would still have to pay off the debt of the company, even if the loan was approved. And instead of the people getting back that dollar, they will lose that dollar. Obama 1 conservative 0.

The American public then came to the flow of how we create jobs in energy. The movement to create alternative energy, and jobs that would rid us on foreign energy (solely) started in Solar, Wind, Natural, and Bio-technology-as Alternative Energy became the number tool of investments. President Barack Obama made a solid choice to invest 60% of the Recovery Act into energy investments. This in turn has created 3 million jobs. And what is meant by 3 million jobs, is in direct jobs such as manufacturing and infrastructure jobs based on the investments on a public to private intervention. Meaning, by tweaking the rules and requirements for Community Block Grants, and personal bonds, and loan packages-companies were able to finance critical projects that created actual jobs in other industries. Example: Megan White from Arizona - wanted to improve her home for the weathering season. She was allowed to work with Solyndra-(what people don't know is this company was a distributor) and one of the sub-contracting companies issues parts to organize a product that created 250,000 in direct jobs. But how did this help Megan White, well Megan was allowed to apply for a grant at her local economic development agency, worth $20,000. With that $20,000 she was able to invest at the local store on improvements to her home. And in the process, Solyndra - would supply the facility that she was purchasing from with the goods she needed. A balanced way to capitalize income on public investments - where the public actually made a profit, and the business side, had stable rates. Obama 2 - conservatives 0

What happened with Solyndra? John Boehner, and the Republican Party wanted to make an example of any company President Barack Obama invested in, and in order to embarrass the president. John Boehner cut - all funding for direct employment and freezes all pay-out options to the energy company. And in directly used chatter to main stream the republican electric to follow a lead of firing public employees in order to overload a system. So by firing public employees in this department that handle such private events, there would be a black lash of applications or overload. That would cause the system to shake out numbers that looked good in the public or media eye, but not what was really going on. Obama 2 - conservatives 1.

The conservative base, knew that if nothing was sent out of Washington, and they attacked President Barack Obama's Health Care Law - they can force President Obama to crack. And the pressure would cause him to make mistakes that would undermine the process, so they can win an election. This is what happened; the republican leadership couldn't find a leader that can challenge President Obama. Like they were opening a can of worms, and the first leader to eat the worms and lead - happened to be the President! For every move they made that would shift the electric in one way, President Obama had his supporters jump on top of them. And leading the base or electric from behind; like stirring a ship that's lost back on track-without even being the captain of the ship! Smart Obama and Team 3 - conservatives 1.

Now the chatter and talk is back to national debt and budget out comes. In an interview on Meet the Press for the 02/19/2012 segment - Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan made a statement that President Barack Obama's budget does nothing to held the general economy. Please note that he is the point man for republican budgets-whom the leadership follows. And in that statement, he said: Obama's budget is $1.9 trillion in revenue increases, and $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. And he said that was a bad thing. Well, I am no expert on money matters-I mean I have certificates (non degree) in small business administration from New York University seminar classes. And have been approved as a notary public in the state of New Jersey-plus become a litigant with the Internal Revenue Service. So these numbers are hard to break down, but I think I can handle it. The number figures of $1.9 trillion means tax incentivizes for private and public interest. And the $1.5 trillion in spending cuts are - deductions and credits that will allow corporate and wealthy regain what was taken away. Get the numbers and look at them well, because Republicans will spin this as a negative. Yet, here's the real ticker-out of that number there will be a $400 billion dollar surplus-were $250 million can be generated on a 4 quarterly basis. Where it comes down to for every $1 that the tax payer spends - America will make $2.50 in profit. This means that the American economy will generate $1.50 on what was spent, and the tax payer will get $1 of that. Sounds like a smart investment doesn't it - I mean this would make republicans jump for joy if President Barack Obama was republican and white.

The sole reason why Paul Ryan discredits this number isn't because of the terms and policies on how the legislation was written-it was on the sole principle that President Obama happens to be half black. And that theory and notion that black men can't be that smart in economics. Well, I am a volunteer that helps marginalize some of the economic interest that we see in some of President Obama's economic Policy. And if you getting a 2.5 to 1 rate on investments-then who cares what type of pigment in the person's skin brought that turn-a-round it should be celebrated as a great achievement. Obama 3 -conservatives 1

If you think President Obama is doing wrong with the economy, just take a look at these important facts. In 2009 in February the Dow Jones Industrial was at 9,000 points. It fell from 10,500 to 8,000 points in the late summer. Where millions of jobs had been lost? Today the Dow Jones Industrial is now approaching 13,000 points in the stock market. That's a huge increase from 8,000 points to 13,000 points and improving. And even though the middle class has seen stable economic growth, we are looking at marginal increase for the middle class if the road map is unchanged. I know people are not happy, but pulling the rug just to score points, and make sure that someone fails is not the answer to a robust American economy. Winner President Obama, for leading and jumping on every issue.

Will You Occupy Justice Speech

One thing about me, and writing books and memoirs—are what people like about my jargons. They love the fact that you will get a moralizing speech somewhere in the documentation. This speech called, “Will You Occupy for Justice,” is about why we as the people made a choice to occupy.


Will You Occupy for Justice

As we the people came together and mocked a symbol of hope and passion for life, plus solidarity to the people. We came to New York City, and staged a protest. We the people protested against these mal-practices of the banking system. We fought against the corruption of greed in capitalism—plus the perception the rich had on the middle class. We as people believed in fighting for the middle class, and the struggling poor. Our fight, against the financial industrial system—isn’t a fight against capitalism; or the overthrow on who is wealthy plus the many that are poor. This fight should always be about economic security, and the power of the people to demand a fare and cleaner government. As I rehash an old statement:

The People are tired I say, (They are tired of what) -- They are tired of being brought by politics.

If you are tired of having your cultural beliefs, the right to worship any religion you choose, plus the moral right to your personal health. You as a person shouldn’t be subjected to the political trials, and religious trial binaural on a public display—to what you do with your bodies. And religious prosecution should never be a political tool, to divide the people from worshiping their God.

The People are tired I say, (They are tired of what) -- They are tired of being brought by politics.

Tired of leaders favoring corporate interest, because of what has been donated to their re-election campaign fund. Tired of leaders, mocking the poor—while jazzercising the same corporate interest that lobbied their campaigns. Tired of special favors for those who incorporate the art of thievery—while mocking the lives of the poor and middle class. Tired of using investments as a tool to segregate the passion of the people. Tired of those who live in the 1% while you have others that occupy the world of the 99%. Tired of record profits from the banking system that bet against your financial health—in a system that gets paid whether you fail or gain success. Like Bank of America—reaping in $4.8 billion dollars in charging 10% in hidden fees on your money marketing accounts, debt accounts, and home equity accounts. While taking $64 billion dollars in T.A.R.P. funds, to bail out their board room debts, while forcing many people into equity problems, that led to homes being foreclosed on! If you are tired of a bank, reaping profits off of your financial misery—then you can understand why people are occupying the streets.

The people are tired I say, (They are tired of what) -- They are tired of being brought by politics.

People are tired of our candidates for president using these religious principles that impact matters on social liabilities, as a marketing tool—to hamper the faith our your elected president. Yes we believe in the ideas that government shouldn’t be in the people’s bedroom. While the faith and beliefs of the people, shouldn’t be marketing tool on mocking someone’s faith. The health of our daughters’ and mothers’ bodies should be a family matter between the house of worship and the family. Not a tool, to divide some people from others based on the church and where that religious entity stands in politics. And the house of worship should never be in presidential campaigns. And candidates should have moral obligations to respect the sanctity of our public policies and religious beliefs, when it comes to family

Public Policy should never be a tool to swift vote the people from their leaders. And it’s against the principles set by the Catholic Church, to intrude people’s lives with matters on family values—to incorporate them into political persuasion. Since a spiritual cleaning, as no grounds to be a public matter.

The people are tired I say, (They are tired of what) -- They are tired of being brought by politics.

We came together in 2008, and worked hard –voted and created a symbol of change. And nobody said that this type of change would be easy, nobody said that changing the makeup of this country was going to happen overnight. And nobody said that working from the bottom up was going to dramatically change federal, state, or municipal government in one session, or year. And nobody anticipated a congressional house, and senatorial republicans—to be insubordinate on the growth of this country, in order to tank it, and make sure our president fails. And the leadership of John Boehner shouldn’t be about a copy-paste movement to swift vote the general public. And from day one, a lot of people who would never vote for, or have voted for President Barack Obama, wanted to make his presidential legacy—an illegitimate president. Where they have gone as far as disrespecting the office of the president

Comming soon in the book: Wall Street Occupied. Wall Street Occupied's copyright's belong to Coaches! 101 (PAC) with the Library of Congress: Control #2011962093, for ISBN: 1468021443, which is scheduled to be released soon.

Voter Suppression

In Hudson County, there is a push to change elections to one day. They say it would save our budgets. But they are WRONG--this is a simple notion of Voter Suppression. And here's why we believe it's time to fight and advocate for voter's right to vote, on who runs our government.

Dear Editor:

Elections:

Jersey City is facing some hard times and challenges, and strong leadership is needed. There’s a strong move and push for our elections to be moved to November. Which bring great concerns to me as an advocate of Hudson County, New Jersey? And this type of populous movement to radically change elections, will present a dead challenge that we are facing today. The whole notion that candidates matter when it comes to election, plus the simple principals that advocates are born to provide the public with the basic information needed. I support Steven Fulop on how he handles a lot of things. Yet, this move to decrease the public’s perception, and marginalize elections—will deter voters from engaging into local politics. And for those that are constant voters, it will take away their advocacy voice. The movement to move elections to November is being spearheaded by Dan Levin. I have also had the opportiunity to stand side-by-side with Dan on key issues. Yet, this one I can’t allow him to influence and make critical decisions on or about.

I am writing this letter on asking the public to contact your elected leaders, and have them suppress this attempt to sway voter’s rights and privileges. What many people don’t know is that if you are a newly registered voter – you right to vote will only happen in a General Election. Since new voters can’t vote in the current election if they are first time voters. And if you recently moved to a new location, you voting right may be disqualified because you lose that record on a voting history. And that process won’t have the due diligence of an out of cycle election—such as the mayor, or school board. Now I know Mr. Dan Levin isn’t a bad guy but to sway voters from voting on an issue to cut the budget is a lack of concern for the people to have the right to advocate for a better government. And I am saying: Candidates matter when it comes to elections, and not the day, or the party they hold.

As the Hudson County representative for the DCCC, DNC and perennial candidate for the newly revamped 8th district in Hudson County! I am asking you to protect your rights to vote. Demand more debates, for local candidate—demand that candidates present themselves to the local block organizations, and the civic groups, and participate in these elections. Because if we have one election cycle, a lot of people will not be able to vote come November.

I would also, like to make one point as well. When you have first time voters--who register in the coming year: they will not be able to vote that year, if the elections where held in November (ONLY). (Since a lot of new voters vote in mayoral elections) They would have to make sure they are registered before the primary of a state or federal election before they can vote. And if there's no local election, they can't learn the system on how to vote until the November election. So now you will have broken ballots --(CHAD) because of voter confusion. Then let say, a person moved -- well they can only vote on a provisionary status, and many times their vote isn't counted in the popular vote. And the way for them to stabilize their voting credentials are to vote on a normal basis -- (municipal and BoE elections) if you take that away you will have a whole lot of people not being able to vote in November because of first time voters, people who recently changed their address-- old voters who are inspired to vote on a CANDIDATE. Just changing the date to create more of an illusion of a voter turnout--doesn't help the an election cycle. Don't save cost on budget items, and basically take the general public out of elections. The reason why we have a system of elections is because of CANDIDATES. Elections are created to know more about the candidates that will lead our government. Taking the people power away is a shameful tactic of voter Suppression. And I will fight any type of voter suppression "right" at the chopping blocks. In fact, this Election Year just might wake me up, and make me fight harder for (People's Change) not principal change.